Turgot on profit

I’m enjoying my wife’s current project editing Turgot.

Anne-Robert-Jacques Turgot (1727–1781)

Here’s the latest, cross-posted to blog.Mises.org:

It is this advance and this continual return of capitals which constitute what one must call the circulation of money — that useful and fruitful circulation which gives life to all the labors of society, which maintains movement and life in the body politic, and which is with great reason compared to the circulation of blood in the animal body. For if, by any disorder whatsoever in the sequence of expenditures on the part of the different classes of society, the undertakers [entrepreneurs] cease to get back their advances with the profit they have a right to expect from them, it is evident that they will be obliged to reduce their undertakings; that the amount of labor, the amount of consumption of the fruits of the earth, the amount of production, and the amount of revenue will be reduced in like measure; that poverty will take the place of wealth; and that the common workmen, ceasing to find employment, will fall into the extremest destitution. (Reflections on the Formation and Distribution of Wealth)

(See also “Economics in 2 Paragraphs.”)

Krugman's intellectual Waterloo

Napoleon Krugman at WaterlooLast Monday evening, Lew Rockwell, from a tip by someone named “Travis,” posted this damning quote of Paul Krugman’s from a 2002 New York Times editorial:

To fight this recession the Fed needs … soaring household spending to offset moribund business investment. [So] Alan Greenspan needs to create a housing bubble to replace the Nasdaq bubble.

Krugman. 2002. Calling for a housing bubble. FULL ARTICLE

A nice note/blog post from the author:

My piece Krugman’s Intellectual Waterloo has been made today’s Daily Article on Mises.org. Check out the hilarious “Krugman-as-Napoleon” image they put together. My thanks to Jeffrey Tucker for selecting it, as well as to nirgrahamUK on the Mises boards and anyone else who passed it on to others.

I consider the Mises Institute web site to be the greatest source for truth and wisdom on the web. So it’s an honor to have something I wrote featured on its main page, and it’s a kick to see my name in the list of Mises Daily Authors, along with the names of a great many of heroes.

I hope my characterization of Krugman’s twisting in the wind will be convincing to people and that this piece will help spread the word regarding the damning quotes that Lew Rockwell and Mark Thornton have discovered. If I could help soften the ground under Krugman’s pedestal and cause it to sink just one inch, I would feel I have truly done good in the world.

Please join the assault on neo-Keyneseanism by contributing a comment to the article’s entry on the Mises Blog.

1 Samuel 1:20

1 Samuel 1:20

“Hannah gave birth to a son whom she named Samuel, saying,
‘Because I asked Yahweh for him.’”

The canceled TV show Kings (which I discovered this week on Hulu.com) has me revisiting the books of Samuel, especially because, while most names map directly (e.g., the shepherd David to David Shepherd, Jonathan of the tribe of Benjamin to Jack Benjamin, Michal to Michelle, the prophet Samuel to Reverend Samuels), King Saul’s TV equivalent is named Silas.

Well, apparently Silas is a Greek form of Saul by way of Aramaic. Clever TV writers.

But Hannah’s explanation of the name Samuel — “Because I asked Yahweh for him” — confused me. So here’s the fascinating tidbit I learn from Wikipedia:

According to 1 Samuel 1:20, Hannah was the mother of Samuel and named him in memory of her requesting a child from God and God listening. Samuel is translated as Heard of God or possibly as a sentence “God has heard” (from ‘Shama’, heard and ‘El’, God — with “Shama” as the verb and “El” as the subject).

However, some textual scholars think that the passage originally referred to King Saul, whose name means “asked” and was later changed by an anti-monarchial editor, so that Saul would no longer appear to have a divinely appointed birth.

more desert-island economics

(via blog.Mises.org)

price fixing in ancient Rome

One very frustrating thing about focusing on ancient history, which I’ve written about before, is that almost none of these historians seems to know anything about basic price theory — and the topic seems particularly relevant to Roman history, where present-day historians of ancient Rome are consistently clueless.

So I read Forty Centuries of Wage and Price Controls: How Not to Fight Inflation, chapter 2: “The Roman Republic and Empire” and decided it was worth sharing with a broader audience.

Enjoy.

what you don't know about what you do know

Why former editor William Rosen chose the 6th century as the subject of his first book :

“The best writerly advice I ever heard (and with which I bored dozens of authors back when I was an editor) is not to write what you know, but to write what you don’t know about what you do know. When I started on this project, I knew a fair bit about European and Mediterranean history, but not much about Late antiquity.”

www.JustiniansFlea.com

Undefendable audio

Defending the Undefendable, print edition Defending the Undefendable, PDF edition Defending the Undefendable, MP3 edition

Futurama is back!

Futurama

The Case Against the Fed

The Case Against the Fed, print edition The Case Against the Fed, Kindle edition The Case Against the Fed, PDF edition The Case Against the Fed, HTML edition The Case Against the Fed, epub edition

preschool property theory

Please check out my friend Carolyn’s wonderful blog post about how a color-matching activity turned into a discussion on the fine points of property theory.

“Instead of walking and talking about the names of different flowers, etc. that we picked up, we ended up having to talk a lot about private property.”

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 261 other followers