imperialism within our borders
bkmarcus
Let me quote Wally Conger quoting PCR:
And speaking of neocons of the John Sunlight variety, Paul Craig Roberts does a remarkable job of succinctly defining the core belief-system of neocons on this morning’s LewRockwell.com:
"Like their forebears among the Jacobins of the French Revolution, the Bolsheviks of the communist revolution, and the National Socialists of Hitler’s revolution, neoconservatives believe that they have a monopoly on virtue and the right to impose hegemony on the rest of the world."
Read the whole article here.

What strikes me here is how Left and Right have once again reversed polarity.
Libertarians are used to thinking of the authoritarian Left as "international(ist) socialist" and the authoritarian Right as "national(ist) socialist" — think Stalin and Hitler. But as well as PCR’s description fits the contemporary mainstream American Right, it could apply just as readily to the mainstream American Left if we change the last word from "world" to "country"!
The left socialists, aka communists, wanted to export their system of economic centralization. The right socialists, aka fascists, wanted to focus their economic intervention on "the nation."
Now, the left and right socialists differed on more than the scope of their mission. They also differed on egalitarianism versus anti-egalitarianism, as well as the stated purpose of revolution (overthrowing bourgeois culture) versus counter-revolution (protecting bourgeois culture), so I don’t want to push this point too hard.
But still. It seems to me that the main difference between Left and Right these days is the question of whether to focus their imperialism at home or abroad.
Posted in history, philosophy |
No Comments »







I thought Wonder Bread? WONDER Bread!? You gotta be kidding me.