individualism for the masses

BK Marcus is an amateur political economist with no formal education in the subject.

He works from Charlottesville, Virginia as an editorial consultant for the Ludwig von Mises Institute and managing editor of Mises.org.

He is no longer a house husband, nor a faculty spouse, but he is still a dilettante and a layabout, at least in spirit.

twitter.com/bkmarcus

recent

Please supportGo To Project Gutenberg

Wikipedia Affiliate Button

"It is no crime to be ignorant of economics, which is, after all, a specialized discipline and one that most people consider to be a 'dismal science.' But it is totally irresponsible to have a loud and vociferous opinion on economic subjects while remaining in this state of ignorance."

Murray Rothbard

calendar

May 2007
S M T W T F S
« Apr   Jun »
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

archives

categories


Benjamin Tucker Marcus
February 19, 2010

Modern Historians Confront the American Revolution

May 11th, 2007 by bkmarcus

The historian must be more than a chronicler, a mere lister of events, writes Murray Rothbard. For his real task is discovering and setting forth the causal connections between events in human history, the complex chain of human purposes, choices, and consequences over time that have shaped the fate of mankind. Investigating the causes of such a portentous event as the American Revolution is more, then, than a mere listing of preceding occurrences; for the historian must weigh the causal significance of these factors, and select those of overriding importance. FULL ARTICLE

Posted in LvMI | No Comments »

domestic terrorists

May 11th, 2007 by bkmarcus


A public service to my readers: here is a guide to the beliefs of domestic terrorist groups.

Posted in war | 1 Comment »

A Rothbardian View of American History

May 11th, 2007 by bkmarcus
Rothbard’s historical method raises a fundamental issue, writes David Gordon: how influential are intellectuals in the course of history, and what motivates them? Rothbard’s response expresses a feature of his entire approach to history. He contrasts two sorts of intellectuals: “court intellectuals”, who serve those in authority, primarily wish to gain money and power for themselves. Revolutionary intellectuals, who oppose the state, do so out of genuine conviction. He minces no words about the former group. FULL ARTICLE

Posted in LvMI | No Comments »