individualism for the masses

BK Marcus is an amateur political economist with no formal education in the subject.

He works from Charlottesville, Virginia as an editorial consultant for the Ludwig von Mises Institute and managing editor of Mises.org.

He is no longer a house husband, nor a faculty spouse, but he is still a dilettante and a layabout, at least in spirit.

twitter.com/bkmarcus

recent

Please supportGo To Project Gutenberg

Wikipedia Affiliate Button

"It is no crime to be ignorant of economics, which is, after all, a specialized discipline and one that most people consider to be a 'dismal science.' But it is totally irresponsible to have a loud and vociferous opinion on economic subjects while remaining in this state of ignorance."

Murray Rothbard

calendar

October 2007
S M T W T F S
« Sep   Nov »
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031  

archives

categories


Benjamin Tucker Marcus
February 19, 2010

Albert Jay Nock

October 13th, 2007 by bkmarcus

Today would have been 137th birthday of Albert Jay Nock, described by the Mises.org Freedom Calendar as “American essayist and libertarian aristocrat.”

In The Betrayal of the American Right, Murray Rothbard called him a “Tory anarchist,” but Nock might have objected to the “Tory” part of the label.

As an individualist, an opponent of Prohibition and Big Business, and an opponent of centralization and coercive authority more generally, Nock was considered a “Man of the Left.”

Then the 1930s New Deal drew most of the 1920s American Left into the social fascism of FDR’s corporate state, leaving laissez-faire individualists like Mencken and Nock in the cold. But rather than openly embracing their own shift to the fascist Right, the American Left turned semantics on its head, called their new corporatism “liberalism” and thereby pinned on the original liberals the labels of “conservative,” “reactionary,” and worse:

The individualists and laissez-faire liberals were stunned and embittered, not just by the mass desertion of their former allies, but also by the abuse these allies now heaped upon them as “reactionaries,” “fascists,” and “Neanderthals.” For decades Men of the Left, the individualists, without changing their position or perspectives one iota, now found themselves bitterly attacked by their erstwhile allies as benighted “extreme right-wingers.” Thus, in December 1933, Nock wrote angrily to Canon Bernard Iddings Bell:

“I see I am now rated as a Tory. So are you — ain’t it? What an ignorant blatherskite FDR must be! We have been called many bad names, you and I, but that one takes the prize.”

Nock’s biographer adds that “Nock thought it odd that an announced radical, anarchist, individualist, single-taxer and apostle of Spencer should be called conservative.”

If you don’t know Nock, you can start with Jeffrey Tucker’s “Albert Jay Nock: Forgotten Man of the Old Right” or you can jump right in to Nock’s own “Anarchist’s Progress,” first published in the American Mercury in 1927 and republished in On Doing the Right Thing:

  1. The Majesty of the Law
  2. Reformers, Noble and Absurd
  3. To Abolish Crime or to Monopolize It?
  4. The Prevalent Air of Cynicism
  1. The Unique Anomalies of the State
  2. The Assumption of a Professional Criminal Class
  3. The Origin of the State
  4. After the Revolution, Napoleon!

Posted in LvMI, history | 1 Comment »

lost in translation

October 13th, 2007 by bkmarcus
Once upon a time, there was an English king named Offa.

He reigned from approximately 757–796.

(He wasn’t king of England; he was king of Mercia, one of the Anglo-Saxon kingdoms before England was united and thus made ripe for takeover by the Normans.)

Late in King Offa’s reign, one of his money makers designed a new coin in his image. On one side, it said “Offa Rex” ; on the other side, it said…

“There is no God but Allah,
and Muhammad is his prophet.”

How did this happen?

Posted in history | No Comments »