<?<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Voltaire</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bkmarcus.com/blog/2007/11/voltaire/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bkmarcus.com/blog/2007/11/voltaire</link>
	<description>individualism for the masses</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Jun 2010 16:13:46 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anthony Gregory</title>
		<link>http://bkmarcus.com/blog/2007/11/voltaire/comment-page-1#comment-14425</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony Gregory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 19:34:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bkmarcus.com/blog/2007/11/voltaire#comment-14425</guid>
		<description>So did this character really think &quot;Age of Enlightenment&quot; was itself an &quot;obscure French philosophical reference&quot;? I don&#039;t get it. And I don&#039;t think the writers do, either. Why would she reply, &quot;Hang on Voltaire?&quot; Why unnecessarily pick a French guy unless she thought the Enlightenment was uniquely French, as this guy implies?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So did this character really think &#8220;Age of Enlightenment&#8221; was itself an &#8220;obscure French philosophical reference&#8221;? I don&#8217;t get it. And I don&#8217;t think the writers do, either. Why would she reply, &#8220;Hang on Voltaire?&#8221; Why unnecessarily pick a French guy unless she thought the Enlightenment was uniquely French, as this guy implies?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
