individualism for the masses

BK Marcus is an amateur political economist with no formal education in the subject.

He works from Charlottesville, Virginia as an editorial consultant for the Ludwig von Mises Institute and managing editor of Mises.org.

He is no longer a house husband, nor a faculty spouse, but he is still a dilettante and a layabout, at least in spirit.

twitter.com/bkmarcus

recent

Please supportGo To Project Gutenberg

Wikipedia Affiliate Button

"It is no crime to be ignorant of economics, which is, after all, a specialized discipline and one that most people consider to be a 'dismal science.' But it is totally irresponsible to have a loud and vociferous opinion on economic subjects while remaining in this state of ignorance."

Murray Rothbard

calendar

February 2009
S M T W T F S
« Jan   Mar »
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728

archives

categories


Benjamin Tucker Marcus
February 19, 2010

in a nutshell

February 4th, 2009 by bkmarcus

Hayek vs KeynesThis is my favorite blog post on Mises.org in a while:

It’s Keynes v. Hayek again

February 4, 2009 7:52 AM by Jeffrey Tucker

So says Richard Armey, who is among the many Republicans who are suddenly making sense after years of kowtowing to Republican-style Keynesian policy. It seems like a universal principle: those who are out of power favor free markets more than those in power. So the agenda seems clear: keep everyone out of power.

Amen.

Posted in LvMI, economics, strategy | No Comments »

camel brand

February 4th, 2009 by bkmarcus

Camel regular, nonfilterFrom Ludwig von Mises’s introduction to Human Action:

There are … some naturalists and physicists who censure economics for not being a natural science and not applying the methods and procedures of the laboratory. It is one of the tasks of this treatise to explode the fallacy of such ideas. In these introductory remarks it may be enough to say a few words about their psychological background. It is common with narrow-minded people to reflect upon every respect in which other people differ from themselves. The camel in the fable takes exception to all other animals for not having a hump, and the Ruritanian criticizes the Laputanian for not being a Ruritanian. The research worker in the laboratory considers it as the sole worthy home of inquiry, and differential equations as the only sound method of expressing the results of scientific thought. He is simply incapable of seeing the epistemological problems of human action. For him economics cannot be anything but a kind of mechanics.

Posted in economics, literature, philosophy | No Comments »